On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:58, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 15:17, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >>> At >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/continuous-archiving.html >>> we say >>> >>> """ >>> Many people choose to use scripts to define their archive_command, so >>> that their postgresql.conf entry looks very simple: >>> >>> archive_command = 'local_backup_script.sh' >>> """ >>> >>> It seems to me, however, that even a simple archive_command like that >>> ought to contain at least %p, right? >> >> Should always need both %p and %f, no? > > Yes unless the script extracts the file name from the path given as %p.
Do we actually guarantee that this will wok? I know our current implementation does, but does the contract in the API actually guarantee that we will not change this implementation? -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
