On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Marti Raudsepp <ma...@juffo.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 05:14, Josh Kupershmidt <schmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Maybe just tweak >> "will be executed" to "will often be executed", or change "using a >> sequential scan of the entire table." to "using a sequential scan of >> the table, or an index-only scan of one of its indexes". > > I don't think we need to specify what the planner does at all. How > about simply "will need to access all rows [in the table]" > > Also +1 for removing references to "other SQL databases".
I just modified this so that it's not outright wrong any more. I think it's still more pessimistic than is warranted, but I wasn't sure exactly how to rephrase it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
