On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:01:34PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 22:26, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote: > > Our chapter, "Comparison of Different Solutions", needs an update to use > > our new streaming replication terminology, and an update to mention the > > synchronous option. > > > > Patch attached. I would like to apply it to head and 9.1. > > Is it really a good idea to remove the name "hot standby" where you've > done so? It's a term that's pretty well set by now. Maybe instad "hot > standby using transaction log replication" instead of taking it away > completely?
Well, hot/warm standby is really a side-feature of replication, not a replication technology itself. WAL streaming is a replication technology. For example, Shared Disk Failover is technically a warm standby too. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
