On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Update docs on numeric storage requirements. >>> >>> Since 9.1, the minimum overhead is three bytes, not five. >> >> Thanks for the commit! >> >> I think that it's worth backporting this to 9.1. Thought? > > I thought about it, but it didn't seem important enough to bother with.
Yes, most v9.1 users would not bother that. But some actually did that. I reported this issue because I received the complaint from them. So I'm still thinking that it's worth backporting unless the backport needs unacceptable lots of effort. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
