On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 04:26:48PM -0800, Jeff Janes wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > > > We don't assume people are reading docs from very old versions. > > > > Even if that is the version they are using? It is, after all, still > under maintenance,
There are three options for doc patches: 1. patch only git head, meaning the next major release 2. do #1, plus the most recent major released version, e.g. 9.2.X 3. #1, #2, and all major supported released versions In general, #1 is normally for wording clarifications, #2 is for usage clarifications, and #3 is to correct mistakes. Not sure I follow that 100%, but that is what I normally do. Is that process good? Did I not follow it? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
