On 02/06/2013 13:47, Kevin Grittner wrote:
That's good as far as it goes, but there's another major reason for
wanting the capability.  There are cases where, due to dirty
converted data or late recognition of the need for a constraint
there is existing data which violates the constraint.  Being able
to add a constraint to protect against creating additional bad data
before all the existing problems are cleaned up can be valuable.

Yeah, that's a valid use case.

Anyway, you seem to know more about this than I do and your English is better, so I'll leave it up to you. I just hope we can get this change into the next minor release so I'd be the last person to suffer from the misinformation that's currently in the documentation.


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja


--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs

Reply via email to