Vik Fearing <vik.fear...@dalibo.com> writes: > On 09/02/2013 04:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Vik Fearing <vik.fear...@dalibo.com> writes: >>> Is there a reason, besides simple oversight, that commit >>> 073d7cb513f5de44530f4bdbaaa4b5d4cce5f984 was not backpatched?
>> AFAICS, it was. > That does seem to indicate it was. But it doesn't seem they made it to > the website: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-altertable.html > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-altertable.html The website has the docs as of the latest releases, and we've not issued any new minor releases since April. (Yeah, we're overdue.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
