There's a minor grammatical typo in the description of leakproof
functions (going back to 9.2).
Patch attached.
Regards,
Dean
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/rules.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/rules.sgml
new file mode 100644
index cb5c8fc..720f976
--- a/doc/src/sgml/rules.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/rules.sgml
@@ -2162,7 +2162,7 @@ CREATE VIEW phone_number WITH (security_
<literal>LEAKPROOF</literal> to be pushed down, as they never receive data
from the view. In contrast, a function that might throw an error depending
on the values received as arguments (such as one that throws an error in the
- event of overflow or division by zero) are not leak-proof, and could provide
+ event of overflow or division by zero) is not leak-proof, and could provide
significant information about the unseen rows if applied before the security
view's row filters.
</para>
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
