On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote: > Hmm. worker_spi module uses bgw_main. Is that bad? Given that work_spi is > supposedly an example or template that you copy-paste from when writing your > own bgworker, we should make sure it follows the best practice. Also, I note > that worker_spi doesn't memset(0) its BackgroundWorker struct, so any > uninitialized fields will contain garbage. Including bgw_library_name and > bgw_function_name. That seems bad.
Yeah, that stuff is bad. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
