On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:42 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Michael Paquier >> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Vignesh Raghunathan >>> <vignesh.pg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> It has been mentioned in Section 63.6 that the first two fields in >>>> PageHeaderData track the most recent WAL entry related to the page. >>>> However, >>>> I am not sure how pd_checksum is related to WAL. Could it be possible that >>>> the sentence has been carried over from previous versions of the >>>> documentations without considering the change to the second field in >>>> PageHeaderData? >>> >>> Yes, the documentation is mistaken. The two bytes of pd_tli have been >>> switched to pd_checksum in 9.3, hence only the first field is relevant >>> for WAL, aka pd_lsn. Looking at this portion of the docs I think that >>> it should be updated as attached, mentioning pd_checksum as well. >> >> Also the type of pd_lsn in the Table 63-3 should be PageXLogRecPtr. > > Yep. See attached FWIW.
Thanks! Applied. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
