On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:11:58PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Frankly, pg_upgrade is, by definition, upgrading on the same server, so
> > I don't even see how they could have mismatched collation library
> > versions, but it seemed good to document it.
>
> By this argument, the proposed patch seems pointless to me.
>
> > The larger issue of moving clusters is a separate issue that needs
> > documentation somewhere else.
>
> Sure.
In looking at the docs, it seems it would go in the Backup section
somewhere:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/backup.html
Seems it would apply to both of these backup sections:
24.2. File System Level Backup
24.3. Continuous Archiving and Point-in-Time Recovery (PITR)
and also here:
25.2. Log-Shipping Standby Servers
It seems odd to put it in all of these places, but where can we
centrally put it?
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
