Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 9/9/16 12:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wouldn't really imagine that it's sensible to set READ ONLY
>> mid-transaction at all, but if it means anything to do that, surely
>> it ought to mean that no updates can happen *after* you set it.
> I think there is a bit of code missing in check_transaction_read_only().
> We prevent changing from read-only to read-write after the first query
> but not vice versa. That seems like an oversight.
The comments around the code make it absolutely clear that it's
intentional, not an "oversight". Whether it's a good idea is open
for discussion, certainly, but I don't see how you can imagine that
it wasn't considered.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
