On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:15:58PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 01:06:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > I actually think "regular" might be a better choice than "normal" for this > > purpose, mainly because somebody looking for statistical aggregates might > > think that "normal" has something to do with normal distributions. So > > maybe we should leave that one group of uses alone and s/normal/regular/ > > in section 9.20. But in any case it would help to define the term > > explicitly in both sections. > > I don't think adding another defined term in this dense text is going to > help so I just specified "general-purpose and statistical aggregates" > where needed; patch attached. > > I didn't touch any mention of "normal" in reference to > pg_aggregate.aggfnoid where normal/"n" has a specific meaning.
Patch applied. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
