On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 07:42:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:35:06PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> It has been pointed out a while ago that the "release date" formatting > >> in the release notes is too flamboyant, more so under the new stylesheets. > >> > >> Here is a patch to make the formatting a bit more subdued. (Obviously, > >> this needs to be expanded to older release notes as well.) > > > I see what you mean. I have changed the markup in head for all branches > > and backpatched this so when we copy release information to back > > branches, it matches. > > I'm a bit dubious about this: it may make things look nicer with the new > docs toolchain, but did anyone check what it looks like with the old one?
I did not but the <note> tag really never made sense for the release note date anyway, so I assumed it would be fine. > Also, now that you mention it, the ability to copy relnote files into > older branches verbatim was already broken by commit 85c11324c. I got > burnt by this while making the release notes last weekend, and was quite > annoyed but there was no time to do anything about it then. Is there > a way to fix that, perhaps by providing some kind of alias for the > relevant section IDs? Yes, I noticed that myself so I assume we would have to copy just the new _sections_ to the back branches, instead of copying the entire file like we have done in the past, at least until this was fixed. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
