On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 09:26:28PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 10:23:36AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote: > > > I'm inclined to change gen_random_uuid() to throw an error if the server > > > is > > > built with --disable-strong-random, like gen_random_bytes() does. That > > > way, > > > they would behave the same. > > > > No objections to do that. I guess you don't need a patch. As this is > > new to 10, I have added an open item. > > [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.] > > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Heikki, > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open > item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a > v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on > open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of > this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may > discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed > well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts > toward speedy resolution. Thanks. > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com
This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
