On 8/7/17 17:46, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 8/1/17 13:33, Andres Freund wrote: >> On 2017-07-31 21:13:48 +0000, sabrina.iq...@target.com wrote: >>> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: >>> >>> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/release-9-6.html >>> Description: >>> >>> Wondering why PostgreSQL still uses the terms master and slave when there >>> are other terms like primary/secondary that can be used in the same manner. >> >> Yea, I think we should be more careful from now on. I think several >> people already try, but it's not been a concerted effort so far. > > Here is a patch to remove remaining uses of "slave" in replication contexts.
committed -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs