On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 5:08 PM, Andreas Kretschmer <andr...@a-kretschmer.de
> wrote:

> Let me explain my question. One of the key aspects of logical replication
> is, that you can define what to replicate. That wouldn't work in this way,
> that's why i'm asking.

One of the key aspects of "standby" is that it is ready to be a drop-in
replacement for the "active" server, and today our logical replication
facility is not capable of ensuring that property and won't be for v11 that
I can tell.  I'm not certain that said capability is even a goal at present.

IOW, why do you need a "standby" that isn't a drop-in replacement for a
primary - i.e., can have a filter on what replicated data it accepts?

David J.

Reply via email to