On 05/05/2018 12:41 PM, Ron wrote:
On 05/05/2018 12:13 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 05/05/2018 07:14 AM, Ron wrote:
Hi,
v9.6
We've got big databases where some of the tables are highly
compressible, but some have many bytea fields containing PDF files.
Can you see a demonstrable difference?
Very much so. The ASCII hex representations of the PDF files are
compressible, but take a *long* time to compress. Uncompressed backups
are 50% faster.
Got it. The developers will need to comment on whether this is doable or
not. The thing is that this would be a new feature. At this point
version 11 is closed to new features, so you are looking at version 12
which means 1.5-2 years out. If it where me I would try piping a pg_dump
plain text output to a compression program other then zlib(used in
pg_dump compression) and see if you can get better performance.
These are different critters then bytea.
Ok. I need the data in my backups anyway, so excluding them is 100%
contrary to what I need.
I understand. What I was trying to say was that the blob you are
referring to, bytea in a field, is not the same as what pg_dump is
referring to, a large object stored in the pg_largeobject table:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/lo-intro.html
So if you want to pursue this feature I think you need to come up with
another name for it to avoid the confusion I mentioned above.
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
