I appreciate everyone's feedback and help and will consider everyone's
input. Thanks again.

On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Data Ace <dataa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Well I think my question is somewhat away from my intention cause of my
> poor understanding and questioning :(
>
>
>
> Actually, I have 1TB data and have hardware spec enough to handle this
> amount of data, but the problem is that it needs too many join operations
> and the analysis process is going too slow right now.
>
>
>
> I've searched and found that graph model nicely fits for network data like
> social data in query performance.
>
>
>
> Should I change my DB (I mean my DB for analysis)? or do I need some other
> solutions or any extension?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Melvin Davidson <melvin6...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 6:30 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/14/2018 02:33 PM, Data Ace wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi, I'm new to the community.
>>>>
>>>> Recently, I've been involved in a project that develops a social
>>>> network data analysis service (and my client's DBMS is based on 
>>>> PostgreSQL).
>>>> I need to gather huge volume of unstructured raw data for this project,
>>>> and the problem is that with PostgreSQL, it would be so dfficult to handle
>>>> this kind of data. Are there any PG extension modules or methods that are
>>>> recommended for my project?
>>>>
>>>
>>> In addition to Ravi's questions:
>>>
>>> What does the data look like?
>>>
>>> What Postgres version?
>>>
>>> How is the data going to get from A <--> B, local or remotely or both?
>>>
>>> Is there another database or program involved in the process?
>>>
>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Adrian Klaver
>>> adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
>>>
>>>
>> In addition to Ravi's and Adrian's questions:
>>
>> What is the hardware configuration?
>>
>> --
>> *Melvin Davidson*
>> *Maj. Database & Exploration Specialist*
>> *Universe Exploration Command – UXC*
>> Employment by invitation only!
>>
>
>

Reply via email to