Hi Guys,

sorry for my late answer. I tested this today and working like a charm!

You are brilliant ! thank you, saved my ass!

Best,
Jacek

śr., 11 lip 2018 o 10:30 Ken Tanzer <ken.tan...@gmail.com> napisał(a):

>
>
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 5:45 PM Adrian Klaver <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>
> wrote:
>
>> select add_trigger('trg_test');
>>
>> test=> \d trg_test
>>
>>                     Table "public.trg_test"
>>
>>
>>   Column |       Type        | Collation | Nullable | Default
>>
>>
>> --------+-------------------+-----------+----------+---------
>>
>>
>>   id     | integer           |           |          |
>>
>>
>>   fld_1  | character varying |           |          |
>>
>>
>> Triggers:
>>
>>
>>      trg_test_change AFTER UPDATE ON trg_test FOR EACH STATEMENT EXECUTE
>> PROCEDURE ts_update()
>>
>>
> To take this a step further, if you really have a lot of tables and want
> to do it automatically, you could do something like this:
>
> SELECT table_name,add_trigger(table_name) FROM information_schema.tables 
> WHERE table_schema='public';
>
> This assumes that you want to add the trigger to _all_ your tables, and
> that you haven't made use of schemas and so your tables are all in the
> public schema.
> If that's not the case, you could adjust accordingly.  It would be safest
> to just pull the table names first, make sure the list is what you want,
> and then run with the add_trigger.  So start with this:
>
> SELECT table_name FROM information_schema.tables WHERE table_schema='public';
>
> and if the list of tables is what you want, then run with the add_trigger
> included.
>
> Cheers,
> Ken
>
>
> --
> AGENCY Software
> A Free Software data system
> By and for non-profits
> *http://agency-software.org/ <http://agency-software.org/>*
> *https://demo.agency-software.org/client
> <https://demo.agency-software.org/client>*
> ken.tan...@agency-software.org
> (253) 245-3801
>
> Subscribe to the mailing list
> <agency-general-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net?body=subscribe> to
> learn more about AGENCY or
> follow the discussion.
>

Reply via email to