David, Thanks a lot for the quick reply.
I clearly misunderstood the references in the code. Best, Martín On Thu, Sep 13th, 2018 at 7:55 PM, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Martín Fernández < fmarti...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > >> From what I could understand (that can be totally wrong), the vacuum >> process is split in multiple small transactions. If the autovacuum is >> canceled, could it be possible that only the latest transaction work be >> lost >> > > > > From the docs: > > > "VACUUM cannot be executed inside a transaction block." > > > As it is non-transactional any work it performs is live immediately and > irrevocably as it occurs. > > > David J. > > >
