> On Oct 16, 2018, at 1:01 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Rob Sargent <robjsarg...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Should reality be half again as large as the estimated row count?
>> coon=# select count(*) from sui.segment;
>> count
>> ----------
>> 49,942,837 -- my commas
>> (1 row)
>
>> coon=# vacuum (analyse, verbose) sui.probandset;
>
> Uh, what does sui.probandset have to do with sui.segment ?
>
> regards, tom lane
In fullness,
INFO: analyzing "sui.segment"
INFO: "segment": scanned 30000 of 1019242 pages, containing 1470000 live rows
and 0 dead rows; 30000 rows in sample, 49942858 estimated total rows
VACUUM
Time: 321934.748 ms (05:21.935)
So, rather accurately estimated (no inserts, deletes) since bogus report.
Looks like its good to 5+ decimal places, given sufficient records.
select 49942858.0/49942837.0;
?column?
------------------------
1.00000042048071878656
(1 row)
This table has no variable length columns. I imagine that helps.
