On 2019-07-17 12:34:41 +0100, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: > We make extensive use of postgresql 'contacting' an external process, > but our use case involves many databases in a cluster rather than many > schemas. Also we don't have to deal with cancelling the external > process. We chose this architecture to avoid many postgresql > connections for LISTEN/NOTIFY. > > We use a pgmemcache interface trigger to update memcached with a > notification of the database holding items to be flushed.
Memcached is a cache. It will delete old items if storage is full (or if
they expire). Is this not a problem in your case or did you make sure
that this cannot happen?
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | we build much bigger, better disasters now
|_|_) | | because we have much more sophisticated
| | | h...@hjp.at | management tools.
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Ross Anderson <https://www.edge.org/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
