On 2020-03-19 16:48:19 -0700, David G. Johnston wrote: > First, it sounds like you care about there being no gaps in the records you > end > up saving. If that is the case then sequences will not work for you.
I think (but I would love to be proven wrong), that *nothing* will work
reliably, if
1) you need gapless numbers which are strictly allocated in sequence
2) you have transactions
3) you don't want to block
Rationale:
Regardless of how you get the next number, the following scenario is
always possible:
Session1: get next number
Session2: get next nummber
Session1: rollback
Session2: commit
At this point you have a gap.
If you can afford to block, I think a simple approach like
create table s(id int, counter int);
...
begin;
...
update s set counter = counter + 1 where id = $whatever returning counter;
-- use counter
commit;
should work. But that effectively serializes your transactions and may
cause some to be aborted to prevent deadlocks.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | h...@hjp.at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
