Greetings, * Tom Lane ([email protected]) wrote: > Rob Sargent <[email protected]> writes: > > Am I (again) alone in finding this a bit hokey? That a user name just > > happens to be a schema name ... > > That's actually strongly encouraged by the SQL spec, if memory serves.
... and all-but-required by some other database systems. Doesn't make it a good idea tho, imv. Thanks, Stephen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
