Ayo <a...@blicky.net> writes: > No luck. It uses the index now, but seemingly only to loop over it. The > integer version uses a HashAggregate, I must have missed something in my > implementation to make the planner avoid that node. Does it have any special > type requirements, other than the hash operator class?
Hmm ... did you remember to set the oprcanhash property on the equality
operator?
regards, tom lane
