Hi Michael
This is the script and explain plan info, please check, seems Filter
remove more records took more time
DO $MAIN$
DECLARE
affect_count integer := 1000;
processed_row_count integer := 0;
BEGIN
LOOP
exit
WHEN affect_count = 0;
UPDATE
app gaa
SET
deleted_at = (
SELECT
CAST(extract(epoch FROM now() at time zone 'utc') *
1000000000 AS bigint))
WHERE
gaa.id IN (
SELECT
gab.id
FROM
app gab
LEFT JOIN pol gp ON gab.policy_id = gp.id
WHERE
gab.policy_type = 'policy.protection.total'
AND gp.name LIKE 'Mobile backup%'
AND gab.deleted_at IS NULL
AND gp.deleted_at IS NOT NULL
LIMIT 1000);
GET DIAGNOSTICS affect_count = ROW_COUNT;
COMMIT;
processed_row_count = processed_row_count + affect_count;
END LOOP;
RAISE NOTICE 'total processed rows %', processed_row_count;
END;
$MAIN$;
--early explain plan, 1000 records update take 156.488 ms
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Update on app gaa (cost=3307.57..6085.41 rows=1000 width=3943) (actual
time=156.347..156.347 rows=0 loops=1)
InitPlan 1 (returns $0)
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.007..0.008
rows=1 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=3307.54..6085.39 rows=1000 width=3943) (actual
time=18.599..33.987 rows=1000 loops=1)
-> HashAggregate (cost=3306.99..3316.99 rows=1000 width=98)
(actual time=18.554..19.085 rows=1000 loops=1)
Group Key: ("ANY_subquery".id)::text
-> Subquery Scan on "ANY_subquery" (cost=2.17..3304.49
rows=1000 width=98) (actual time=0.041..18.052 rows=1000 loops=1)
-> Limit (cost=2.17..3294.49 rows=1000 width=37)
(actual time=0.030..17.827 rows=1000 loops=1)
-> Merge Join (cost=2.17..877396.03
rows=266497 width=37) (actual time=0.029..17.764 rows=1000 loops=1)
Merge Cond: ((gab.policy_id)::text = (gp.id
)::text)
-> Index Scan using
tmp_uq_policy_id_context2 on app gab (cost=0.56..487631.06 rows=3151167
width=74) (actual time=0.018..9.192 rows=3542 loops=1)
Filter: ((policy_type)::text =
'policy.protection.total'::text)
Rows Removed by Filter: 2064
-> Index Scan using pol_pkey on pol gp
(cost=0.56..378322.78 rows=361105 width=37) (actual time=0.008..7.380
rows=1006 loops=1)
Filter: ((deleted_at IS NOT NULL)
AND (name ~~ 'Mobile backup%'::text))
Rows Removed by Filter: 3502
-> Index Scan using app2_pkey on app gaa (cost=0.56..2.77 rows=1
width=3874) (actual time=0.014..0.014 rows=1 loops=1000)
Index Cond: ((id)::text = ("ANY_subquery".id)::text)
Planning Time: 0.852 ms
Execution Time: 156.488 ms
--later explain plan, 1000 records update take 13301.600 ms
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Update on app gaa (cost=3789.35..6567.19 rows=1000 width=3980) (actual
time=13301.466..13301.466 rows=0 loops=1)
InitPlan 1 (returns $0)
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=0.007..0.007
rows=1 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=3789.32..6567.17 rows=1000 width=3980) (actual
time=12881.004..12896.440 rows=1000 loops=1)
-> HashAggregate (cost=3788.77..3798.77 rows=1000 width=98)
(actual time=12880.958..12881.378 rows=1000 loops=1)
Group Key: ("ANY_subquery".id)::text
-> Subquery Scan on "ANY_subquery" (cost=2.17..3786.27
rows=1000 width=98) (actual time=12850.663..12880.505 rows=1000 loops=1)
-> Limit (cost=2.17..3776.27 rows=1000 width=37)
(actual time=12850.656..12880.233 rows=1000 loops=1)
-> Merge Join (cost=2.17..862421.74
rows=228510 width=37) (actual time=12850.655..12880.162 rows=1000 loops=1)
Merge Cond: ((gab.policy_id)::text = (gp.id
)::text)
-> Index Scan using
tmp_uq_policy_id_context2 on app gab (cost=0.56..474159.31 rows=2701994
width=74) (actual time=0.017..6054.269 rows=2302988 loops=1)
Filter: ((policy_type)::text =
'policy.protection.total'::text)
Rows Removed by Filter: 1822946
-> Index Scan using pol_pkey on pol gp
(cost=0.56..378322.78 rows=361105 width=37) (actual time=0.007..5976.346
rows=936686 loops=1)
Filter: ((deleted_at IS NOT NULL)
AND (name ~~ 'Mobile backup%'::text))
Rows Removed by Filter: 3152553
-> Index Scan using app2_pkey on app gaa (cost=0.56..2.77 rows=1
width=3911) (actual time=0.014..0.014 rows=1 loops=1000)
Index Cond: ((id)::text = ("ANY_subquery".id)::text)
Planning Time: 0.785 ms
Execution Time: 13301.600 ms
--we also choose a temporary table solution to test, script as below
DO $MAIN$
DECLARE
affect_count integer;
offset_count integer:=0;
chunk_size CONSTANT integer :=1000;
sleep_sec CONSTANT numeric :=0.1;
BEGIN
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS tmp_usage_tbl;
CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE tmp_usage_tbl(id character varying(36));
INSERT INTO tmp_usage_tbl(id)
SELECT
gab.id
FROM
app gab
LEFT JOIN pol gp ON gab.policy_id = gp.id
WHERE
gab.policy_type = 'policy.protection.total'
AND gp.name LIKE 'Mobile backup%'
AND gab.deleted_at IS NULL
AND gp.deleted_at IS NOT NULL;
loop
exit when affect_count=0;
UPDATE
app gaa
SET
deleted_at = (
SELECT
CAST(extract(epoch FROM now() at time zone 'utc') *
1000000000 AS bigint))
WHERE gaa.id IN (SELECT id
FROM tmp_usage_tbl
order by id
LIMIT chunk_size offset offset_count);
GET DIAGNOSTICS affect_count = ROW_COUNT;
commit;
offset_count:=offset_count+chunk_size;
PERFORM pg_sleep(sleep_sec);
end loop;
END;
$MAIN$;
--1000 records update take around 2000 ms(each time same as use temporay
table)
which solution is better please?
Michael Lewis <mle...@entrata.com> 于2021年2月27日周六 上午1:46写道：
> It might be a concern, but generally that should be a row level lock and
> only block other update/delete options on those rows. It might be helpful
> to look at the explain analyze output early on vs later in the process. It
> might be that you are getting very few hot updates and indexes are being
> updated constantly.
>
>>
