On 3/10/21 11:56 AM, Martín Fernández wrote:
On 10 Mar 2021, at 11:25, Ron <ronljohnso...@gmail.com
<mailto:ronljohnso...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 3/10/21 2:10 AM, Radoslav Nedyalkov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 3:56 AM Martín Fernández <fmarti...@gmail.com
<mailto:fmarti...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
I’m troubleshooting a problem at my company with a pg 12 cluster
that we run.
We are using Amazon DMS to replicate data from our database into S3
buckets. DMS replicates data by using logical replication slots.
After introducing DMS in our environment, we have seen an increase
in CPU load of 20 points at business hours (from ~60% to ~80%).
The other thing that we have identified is that AccessShareLocks
increase considerably when DMS running.
Based on this information, I’m trying to understand if this is
something expected when running logical replication or not. We’ve
been running physical replication for several years and we haven’t
seen nothing like this. It could be the case that the issue is not
related at all with logical replication and is purely a DMS artifact.
Thanks before hand!
Best,
Martín
Hi,
I would check in pg_stat_activity what those logical replication slots
do. I guess COPY.
If it's a full-load or full-load-and-cdc, then it's almost certainly a COPY.
We are doing full-load and full-load-and-cdc. At this point it’s just cdc
since the full load was done month ago.
Then it's "just" logical replication.
Are you doing one shot copy ? every day ? Then copying all the tables
will lead to load increase.
How many tables at a time DMS copies? It should be configurable.
It definitely is, with the MaxFullLoadSubTasks parameter. The default is 8.
We are copying a lot of tables. 100+
If right now you're just doing CDC replication, then you're *synchronizing*
lots of tables. How often are they modified?
AccessShareLock is absolutely normal. You have a transaction doing
SELECT (COPY) over a table.
If DMS with Postgresql as the source is anything like when Oracle is the
source (we're testing Oracle -> RDS Postgresql) then it starts a
SERIALIZABLE transaction.
My guess at this point is that the CPU load increases due to the increase
of AccessShareLocks, is that a fair assumption ? Have you seen a similar
behavior in Oracle ?
I don't have access to the Oracle database, and so far we're just testing on
the low-volume QA system.
Further, I don't know enough about how logical replication works to have an
opinion.
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.
