On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 11:09, Glen Huang <hey...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, but are they equivalent to serializable transactions? >
No, they are not. Dave Cramer www.postgres.rocks > > On Apr 1, 2021, at 11:04 PM, Dave Cramer <davecramer@postgres.rocks> > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 at 10:50, Glen Huang <hey...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> From application’s standpoint, it seems using CTE saves a lot work. You >> no longer need to parse values out only to pass them back in, and only one >> round-trip to the db server. >> >> If I’m not wrong, CTE is equivalent to serializable transactions? So I >> guess the downsize is that quarries can’t be run in parallel? >> > > I do not think a CTE changes the isolation level. > >> >> If I decide to replace all my transaction code with CTE, will I shoot >> myself in the foot down the road? >> > > > Dave Cramer > www.postgres.rocks > >
