I've been seeing what looks like unbounded memory growth (until the OOM killer 
kicks in and kills the postgres process) when running a pl/pgsql function that 
performs TRUNCATE statements against various temporary tables in a loop. I 
think I've been able to come up with some fairly simple reproductions of the 
issue in isolation, but I'm trying to figure out if this is a memory leak or of 
I'm perhaps doing something wrong with tuning or other settings.

What I've observed:

- The memory growth occurs if the temp table has indexes or a primary key set 
on it.
- Alternatively, the memory growth also occurs if the temp table has certain 
column types on it (eg, "text" types).
- If the table doesn't have indexes and only has integer columns present, then 
the memory growth does *not* occur.
- I originally saw this against a PostgreSQL 12 server, but I've tested this 
against PostgreSQL 9.6.22, 12.7, and 13.3 Docker containers and reproduced it 
against all versions in the containers.

Here are 2 separate examples that seem to show the memory growth on the server 
(the first being a table with a "text" column, the second example having no 
text column but a primary key index):

DO $$
  DECLARE
    i bigint;
  BEGIN
    CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE pg_temp.foo (id integer, bar text);

    FOR i IN 1..200000000 LOOP
      TRUNCATE pg_temp.foo;
    END LOOP;
  END
$$

DO $$
  DECLARE
    i bigint;
  BEGIN
    CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE pg_temp.foo (id integer);
    ALTER TABLE pg_temp.foo ADD PRIMARY KEY (id);

    FOR i IN 1..200000000 LOOP
      TRUNCATE pg_temp.foo;
    END LOOP;
  END
$$

Compare that to this example (which doesn't have an index or any other column 
types that trigger this), which does *not* show any memory growth:

DO $$
  DECLARE
    i bigint;
  BEGIN
    CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE pg_temp.foo (id integer);

    FOR i IN 1..200000000 LOOP
      TRUNCATE pg_temp.foo;
    END LOOP;
  END
$$

Any help in determining what's going on here (or if there are other ways to go 
about this) would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you!
Nick


Reply via email to