I see an issue with the operator. GIN index is capable of performing index scan and index-only scan.
Regards, Ninad Shah On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 20:57, Michael Lewis <mle...@entrata.com> wrote: > This is showing many false positives from the index scan that get removed > when the actual values are examined. With such a long search parameter, > that does not seem surprising. I would expect a search on "raj nagar > ghaziabad 201017" or something like that to yield far fewer results from > the index scan. I don't know GIN indexes super well, but I would guess that > including words that are very common will yield false positives that get > filtered out later. > >>
