On 15/12/2021, at 11:51 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> You should
> probably palloc temp arrays right here and then use construct_md_array
> directly instead of dealing with an ArrayBuildState.

OK, I gave that a go [1] this time in a vec_agg_sum() aggregate, that operates 
much the same as the vec_agg_mean() one and is behaving in the same way. For 
example this shows the correct values:

SELECT vec_agg_sum(nums) FROM measurements;
NOTICE:  sum 0 = 4.92
NOTICE:  sum 1 = 5.91
NOTICE:  sum 2 = 14.80
    vec_agg_sum    
-------------------
 {4.92,5.91,14.80}
(1 row)


But adding unnest() goes back to seemingly memory address values:

SELECT unnest(vec_agg_sum(nums)) FROM measurements;
NOTICE:  sum 0 = 4.92
NOTICE:  sum 1 = 5.91
NOTICE:  sum 2 = 14.80
     unnest     
----------------
 94069010663032
 94069010663044
 94069010663056
(3 rows)

Any other ideas I could look into?

— m@

[1] 
https://github.com/SolarNetwork/aggs_for_vecs/blob/df8b950c73d9b32fa6f016b44dd8859e9341fe0f/vec_agg_sum.c#L50-L52
 
<https://github.com/SolarNetwork/aggs_for_vecs/blob/df8b950c73d9b32fa6f016b44dd8859e9341fe0f/vec_agg_sum.c#L50-L52>

Reply via email to