"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 7:07 PM Bryn Llewellyn <b...@yugabyte.com>
> wrote:
>> This is the bug.
> While I haven't experimented with this for confirmation, what you are
> proposing here (set + parallel safe) is an impossible runtime
> combination (semantic rule) but perfectly valid to write syntactically.
I'm not sure that that's actually disallowed. In any case, Bryn's
right, the combination of a SET clause and a PARALLEL clause is
implemented incorrectly in AlterFunction. Careless coding :-(
regards, tom lane
