Bryn Llewellyn <b...@yugabyte.com> writes:
> My other question was about the "connamespace" column. It seemed to me,
> both at first and still now, that this is a clear instance of a
> transitive dependency.
I think a more productive way to think about it is that it's
denormalization for efficiency; specifically to let constraints
be looked up by name+namespace without having to get other
catalogs involved. (SET CONSTRAINTS is one thing that requires
that, and I think there are others.)
regards, tom lane
