Hi

po 5. 12. 2022 v 6:49 odesílatel shashidhar Reddy <
shashidharreddy...@gmail.com> napsal:

> Pavel,
>
> Where can I get list-dbgsym-packages.sh script?
>

https://manpages.debian.org/testing/debian-goodies/find-dbgsym-packages.1.en.html

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash

please, don't use top-post style in this mailing list
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style

Regards

Pavel



> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 10:04 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> st 30. 11. 2022 v 5:28 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>
>> napsal:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> st 30. 11. 2022 v 1:38 odesílatel shashidhar Reddy <
>>> shashidharreddy...@gmail.com> napsal:
>>>
>>>> I have tried updating after upgrade but that wasn't  working, so I have
>>>> dropped and recreated the extension.
>>>> Now it is crashing every time when we call the function.
>>>>
>>>
>>> what is version od plpgsql_check on Postgres 12, what is version of
>>> plpgsql_check on Postgres 13 (with version of minor release)?
>>>
>>> Can you send backtrace?
>>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Getting_a_stack_trace_of_a_running_PostgreSQL_backend_on_Linux/BSD
>>>
>>
>> Do you have installed some other extensions?
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 29 Nov, 2022, 9:58 pm Pavel Stehule, <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> út 29. 11. 2022 v 16:37 odesílatel shashidhar Reddy <
>>>>> shashidharreddy...@gmail.com> napsal:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Plogsql check version is 2.2 and one more finding is before calling
>>>>>> the function if we drop and recreate the plpgsql_check extension there is
>>>>>> no issue, but each time we can't drop and create.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe you need to run ALTER EXTENSION plpgsql_check UPDATE before
>>>>> first usage in pg 13
>>>>>
>>>>> If the extension works after re-installation, then the problem is not
>>>>> in an extension.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Nov, 2022, 7:19 pm shashidhar Reddy, <
>>>>>> shashidharreddy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello Pavel,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the function causing the issue on all servers, and also i
>>>>>>> noticed when I use *plpgsql_check_function *in any function I am
>>>>>>> facing the same issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 6:43 PM Pavel Stehule <
>>>>>>> pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> út 29. 11. 2022 v 13:49 odesílatel shashidhar Reddy <
>>>>>>>> shashidharreddy...@gmail.com> napsal:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Recently we have upgraded postgres from version 12 to 13 and
>>>>>>>>> upgraded  plpgsql_check to the latest version but after upgrade
>>>>>>>>> when calling the below function causing postgres restart .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pro.po_check(
>>>>>>>>> )
>>>>>>>>>     RETURNS void
>>>>>>>>>     LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'
>>>>>>>>>     COST 100
>>>>>>>>>     VOLATILE SECURITY DEFINER PARALLEL UNSAFE
>>>>>>>>> AS $BODY$
>>>>>>>>> DECLARE
>>>>>>>>> BEGIN
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     PERFORM p.oid, n.nspname, p.proname,
>>>>>>>>> plpgsql_check_function(p.oid)
>>>>>>>>>     FROM pg_catalog.pg_namespace n
>>>>>>>>>     JOIN pg_catalog.pg_proc p ON pronamespace = n.oid
>>>>>>>>>     JOIN pg_catalog.pg_language l ON p.prolang = l.oid
>>>>>>>>>     WHERE l.lanname = 'plpgsql' AND p.prorettype <> 2279
>>>>>>>>>     and upper(n.nspname) like upper('Pro');
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> END;
>>>>>>>>> $BODY$;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> and the error in syslogs shows
>>>>>>>>> kernel: [93631.415790] postgres[86383]: segfault at 80 ip
>>>>>>>>> 00007f07f3e3eefd sp 00007fffcf1db500 error 4 in
>>>>>>>>> plpgsql_check.so[7f07f3e2e000+34000]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it can be a bug in plpgsql_check. But I am not able to fix it
>>>>>>>> without some information. Can you send the reproducer (minimal example 
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> your code, that reproduce this error)?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pavel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Shashidhar
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Shashidhar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
> --
> Shashidhar
>

Reply via email to