Copied to the list On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 at 08:18, Tony Shelver <tshel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 at 08:04, Tony Shelver <tshel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 15:10, Marc Millas <marc.mil...@mokadb.com> wrote: >> >>> Sorry for inappropriate "reply". >>> >>> if you do check the debian postgis repo, you ll find that its NOT >>> possible to choose a postgis version. >>> its possible for postgis 2.4 and 2.5, then ALL 3.x versions are >>> inaccessible but one, that did change from time to time. >>> (you MUST ask for postgis 3 without being able to ask for 3.0 or 3.1 >>> or... its like asking for postgres 9 without .5 or .6) >>> 2 of my customers reverse to a RH family linux because they have been >>> unable to install the requested postgres/postgis version on debian. >>> when I did ask the team, the reply was: we cannot package for all cross >>> possibilities (ie. 5 postgres x 6 postgis, less some impossibilities >>> according to postgis matrix) >>> >>> > Maybe I am not understanding this, but have you checked the UbuntuGIS > source? I know not pure Debian, but... > > Sent before complete: > > UbuntuGIS stable shows PostGIS 2.4 and 2.5 available, as well as 3.1 and > 3.2 : > https://launchpad.net/%7Eubuntugis/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+index?batch=75&memo=75&start=75 > Got this link from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGIS via > https://postgis.net/install/ > Also note that UbuntuGIS is based off the DebianGIS project: > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianGis > > We run both Ubuntu and Centos servers. The change to Centos licensing has > led us to support it only for one specific application that is embedded in > Centos that we are trying to end-of-life ASAP. At least Ubuntu server has > a 5 year support window, and Ubuntu has now announced a limited 'free' Pro > option for smaller businesses that provides a 10 year window. > > > Regards > > >>
