On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, 05:02 Adrian Klaver, <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote:

> On 1/29/24 11:35, Shaheed Haque wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, 00:27 Adrian Klaver, <adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
> > <mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     On 1/29/24 10:12, Shaheed Haque wrote:
> >
> >
> >      >
> >      > Yes. But I was under the impression that the initial copy of
> logical
> >      > replication was the same?
> >      >
> >
> >     Are you taking about the copy_data option to WITH?
> >
> >     If so yes and no.
> >
> >     Yes as it uses COPY to transfer the data.
> >
> >
> > Yes, this is what I meant.
> >
> >     No as what COPY transfers can be affected by WHERE clauses on the
> >     publisher. Also if you have cascading publishers/subscriptions the
> >     'original' data maybe upstream of the publisher you are comparing to.
> >
> >
> > Good points, understood. For the next bit, let's assume neither of these
> > are in play.
> >
> >     Finally logical replication is generally not static so there is the
> >     issue of determining a point in time for the check.
> >
> >
> > Indeed. I currently have a static source db but would eventually like to
> > eliminate the implied downtime. What I'd like to provide my user is some
>
> Implied downtime of what?
>
> > indication of progress initially during the copy_data phase, and for the
> > future, of the anticipated incremental convergence.
> >
> > And, as per my other note, I would ideally like to be able to do this
> > using only a connection to one db.
> >
> > I was assuming that logical replication needed "something" similar
> > internally, and was hoping the LSNs were that "something".
>
> I'm going to say up front I am no expert on the internals of logical
> replication. Will point you at:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/protocol-message-formats.html
>
> A quick look at that indicates to me it is more involved then you think.
>

I'll take a look. Thanks for the tip and the gentle guidance; it is much
appreciated.


> >
> > Thanks, Shaheed
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     Adrian Klaver
> >     adrian.kla...@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.kla...@aklaver.com>
> >
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian.kla...@aklaver.com
>
>

Reply via email to