> On Sep 10, 2024, at 15:57, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at> wrote: > So the upper limit of the first partition is strictly bigger than the lower > end > of the second partition. > > "record" types have the same lexicographical sorting order as ORDER BY > clauses. Ah, OK, got it. I was thinking of them as a points on a plane, which was misleading. Thanks!
- Overlapping values (?) in multi-column partitioned table... Christophe Pettus
- Re: Overlapping values (?) in multi-column partitio... Laurenz Albe
- Re: Overlapping values (?) in multi-column part... David Rowley
- Re: Overlapping values (?) in multi-column ... Christophe Pettus
- Re: Overlapping values (?) in multi-column part... Christophe Pettus
- Re: Overlapping values (?) in multi-column partitio... Brent Wood
- Re: Overlapping values (?) in multi-column part... Christophe Pettus