Aggregate (cost=8581.22..8581.23 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=1209.498..1210.530 rows=1 loops=1) Buffers: shared hit=3108 read=4314 dirtied=1 I/O Timings: shared read=1169.977 -> Gather (cost=8580.80..8581.21 rows=4 width=8) (actual time=1209.371..1210.526 rows=5 loops=1) Workers Planned: 4 Workers Launched: 4 Buffers: shared hit=3108 read=4314 dirtied=1 I/O Timings: shared read=1169.977 -> Aggregate (cost=7580.80..7580.81 rows=1 width=8) (actual time=1206.518..1206.520 rows=1 loops=5) Buffers: shared hit=3105 read=4314 dirtied=1 I/O Timings: shared read=1169.977 -> Hash Join (cost=2620.70..7578.45 rows=937 width=0) (actual time=148.965..1206.330 rows=1897 loops=5) Buffers: shared hit=3105 read=4314 dirtied=1 I/O Timings: shared read=1169.977 -> Index Only Scan using IX_Collaborators_TenantId_IsDeleted_RunningIndex on Collaborators c (cost=0.55..4619.26 rows=11407 width=80) (actual time=2.815..1058.793 rows=7474 loops=5) Index Cond: ((c."TenantId" = '0f8026c775a5499fdd3ccd193a15f94c3b4ae58a'::text) AND (c."IsDeleted" = false)) Heap Fetches: 3711 Buffers: shared hit=2332 read=3563 I/O Timings: shared read=1028.548 -> Hash (cost=2479.01..2479.01 rows=11292 width=79) (actual time=144.988..144.989 rows=1983 loops=5) Buffers: shared hit=637 read=751 dirtied=1 I/O Timings: shared read=141.429 -> Index Only Scan using IX_IntegrationCollaboration_TenantId_IsIntegrationDeleted_IsDe~ on IntegrationCollaboration i (cost=0.55..2479.01 rows=11292 width=79) (actual time=1.804..144.122 rows=1983 loops=5) Index Cond: (i."TenantId" = '0f8026c775a5499fdd3ccd193a15f94c3b4ae58a'::text) Heap Fetches: 112 Buffers: shared hit=637 read=751 dirtied=1 I/O Timings: shared read=141.429 Planning: Buffers: shared hit=440 Execution time: 1210.592 ms
So we can see here that the query read 4314 blocks in 1.2 sec.. (ive done 4314 * 8kb / 1.2sec which is about 28 MB/s)… Hope you’ll have any clue 😊 From: Christophe Pettus <x...@thebuild.com> Date: Monday, 31 March 2025 at 21:44 To: Eden Aharoni <ed...@legitsecurity.com> Cc: pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org> Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] RDS IO Read time > On Mar 31, 2025, at 11:30, Eden Aharoni <ed...@legitsecurity.com> wrote: > > Can you please tell me what other data might help? You can show your work on how you got the megabytes/second number. (Be aware that on a general open-source mailing list, there's only so much debugging that we can do of a specific problem that is not a PostgreSQL bug.)