Laurenz Albe <laurenz.a...@cybertec.at> writes: > On Fri, 2025-07-25 at 14:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> So ... any chance you have a data type named _sa_setup_role?
> ... it could also be a type "sa_setup_role", and "_sa_setup_role"
> is interpreted as the corresponding array type:
Oh, of course --- that's a good deal more likely than my version.
regards, tom lane
