On Tue, 2025-09-30 at 13:53 +0530, Ashish Mukherjee wrote: > Now the consideration is to use some other encryption option for the > database which will work fine on pgsql 17. Cybertec's technology is > one route, the other is EDB. I am happy to hear experiences of folks > here with pgsql encryption options for v17 on large databases > (2.5T in our case).
I will refrain from making a recommendation, but you should know that data-at-rest encryption will always incur a certain performance penalty. Whatever solution you choose, you should run performance tests. Yours, Laurenz Albe
