On Sun, 19 Oct 2025, Laurenz Albe wrote:
That depends on what you do with the table.
Laurenz, That makes sense.
Are your SQL statements simple and natural with the current design? Then stick with what you have now.
That's what I'm going to do. I was curious when a timestamp column was more efficient, or otherwise preferred, since only a couple of my databases have a table with both date and time. And neither has many rows, but one could be quite large some time in the future. Thanks very much, Rich
