Hi, again, According to Google AI versions prior to 16 can be built by smply running nmake.
But I really don't want to do that and prefer to stay in par with Linux version. Is it possible? Thank you. On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 11:55 PM Igor Korot <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Adrian, > > On Fri, May 8, 2026 at 10:46 AM Adrian Klaver <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 5/8/26 11:12 AM, Igor Korot wrote: > > > Hi, Adrian, > > > > > > On Fri, May 8, 2026 at 11:24 AM Adrian Klaver <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On 5/8/26 8:34 AM, Igor Korot wrote: > > >>> Hi, Adrian, > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, May 8, 2026 at 7:32 AM Adrian Klaver <[email protected] > > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> On 5/7/26 11:36 PM, Igor Korot wrote: > > >>> > Hi, > > >>> > A long time ago I built both Debug and Release versions of > > >>> libpq. > > >>> > > >>> Define what distinguishes Debug from Release version. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Debug - on *nix-like systems it compiles with “-g”. On windows it has > > >>> references to the source code. > > >>> > > >>> Release - it’s stripped from the source code references. > > >> > > >> What are the specific parameters you use to compile in each case? > > > > > > I don't remember already. > > > But I THINK I did use default all the way through. > > > > To me it looks like you need to review your tool chain and build process. > > So I'd like to get back to this. > > Turns out I had a very old 9.6 version. > > Now I checked and on my Linux box I have 17.4 > > What I'd like to do is integrate libpq building inside MSVC as a dependency. > > Is it possible? > > If not - what's the simplest possible way of building the library? > > Thank you > > > > > > > >> -- > > >> Adrian Klaver > > >> [email protected] > >
