> > > system that won't stay up consistently is approaching worthlessness > > > for mission-critical 24x7 applications. And if the masses > > > leave because of system reliability problems, you can be very, > > > very certain about what they will tell their friends and coworkers. > > > > And we don't have a problem in this area, do we? > > Please tell me you're kidding. We don't have roll-forward logging until 7.1, and require vacuum regularly. Other than that, I don't know of any major issues. Reliability has always been of primary importance. We wouldn't be where we are today without reliability. -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026 ************
- [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQ... Jose Miguel Pereira Tavares
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of Postg... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Ed Loehr
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQ... Ed Loehr
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of Postg... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of ... Ed Loehr
- Re: [GENERAL] Future... Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [GENERAL] Fu... Ed Loehr
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Marten Feldtmann
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Clark C. Evans
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQ... Clark C. Evans
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of PostgreSQ... john huttley
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of Postg... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [GENERAL] Future of Postg... Adriaan Joubert