Chris Bitmead wrote: > > > In this > > case, it would only look down into the tree to 3 levels below supertable and > > you'd never get row-types that are down lower than level 3. Anyhow, I still > > don't think returning multple row-types is going to happen, OTOH, I'm pretty sure that original Postgres did allow for it. > > not that I have any authority one way or the other! :-) > > ------------- Hannu
- [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql OO Patch Chris
- [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql OO Patch Peter Eisentraut
- [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql OO Patch Robert B. Easter
- [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql OO Patch Chris Bitmead
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql O... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql O... Mike Mascari
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] Postgre... Chris Bitmead
- Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql OO Pa... Marten Feldtmann