Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > How much is the age decremented by on a vacuum run then?
>
> It should be decremented to the vacuum_freeze_min_age. However, I'm
> running some experiments with your settings and apparently it's not
> working as it should.
Nah, false alarm, it's working as expected for me. And I see the age of
databases being correctly decreased to the freeze min age (plus however
many transactions it took to do the vacuuming work). So I'm still at a
loss on why is it failing to advance the datfrozenxid of your database.
Please let me have a look at this query result while connected to that
database:
select relname, relfrozenxid from pg_class where relkind in ('r', 't');
You can change the relname to oid if showing the table names is
problematic for you.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/5ZYLFMCVHXC
Al principio era UNIX, y UNIX habló y dijo: "Hello world\n".
No dijo "Hello New Jersey\n", ni "Hello USA\n".
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
