On 8/22/07, Dmitry Koterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, the controller is configured to use 75% of its memory for write
> caching and 25% - for read caching. So reads cannot flood writes.
128 Meg is a pretty small cache for a modern RAID controller. I
wonder if this one is just a dog performer.
Have you looked at things like the Areca or Escalade with 1g or more
cache on them?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
