I apologize for resending this but my editor in combination with Yahoo's web mail interface horribly mangled it...
>----- Original Message ---- >From: Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Shelby Cain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Terry Yapt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >pgsql-general@postgresql.org >Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 1:08:44 AM >Subject: Re: [GENERAL] FATAL: could not reattach to shared memory (Win32) > >Not that wild a guess, really :-) I'd say it's a very good possibility - >but I have no idea why it'd do that, since all backends load the same >DLLs at that stage. > >//Magnus > Assuming this is an issue with shared libraries, I think it would have more to do with the way Windows resolves address conflicts on process startup than anything caused by explicit calls to LoadLibrary(). Looking at postgres.exe with the dependency viewer from Visual Studio 6, I see that the following shared library dependencies embedded in the executable image that having conflicting base addresses. If I'm not mistaken, Windows will automatically relocate these libraries prior to actual code execution so there would be no opportunity for that particular instance of postgres.exe to map the shared memory if the address space is already in use by a relocated dll. libeay32.dll - 0x10000000 libiconv-2.dll - 0x10000000 libintl-2.dll - 0x10000000 ssleay32.dll - 0x10000000 comerr32.dll - 0x1c000000 krb5_32.dll - 0x1c000000 I also found a KB article that addresses ERROR_INVALID_MEMORY being returned from MapViewOfFileEx(). http://support.microsoft.com/kb/125713 The article specifically addresses the concern where multiple processes must use the same address for mappings and how to accomplish that under Windows. Search for "Addresses of Mapped Views". The only thing that really gives me any pause is the fact the article hasn't been updated past the NT 3.51/Windows 9x era but the underlying behavior might not have been changed in Windows 2000/XP/etc. Regards, Shelby Cain ____________________________________________________________________________________ Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
