On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:44:38PM +0200, Kamil Srot wrote:
> When this problem appeared for the first time, I had clearly the
> wraparound problem... I did vacuum it and partially restored the data...
I don't think vacuum would "fix" a wrap around problem in the way you
describe. I don't think you have a wrap problem.
> From above mentioned duplications of relatio names and what Tom wrote
> recently (doesn't see like WA problem), it looks like the relation name
> is/gets corrupted in some way and this corruption is internally taken
> over to another instance of relation named the same but in another
> database... but I know - it's too speculative.
No, it just doesn't work that way. Are these all shared on the same
hardware? Are you sure you're not having other problems?
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The year's penultimate month" is not in truth a good way of saying
November.
--H.W. Fowler
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
