At 08:24 10/07/00 -0400, Robert D. Nelson wrote:
>
>Stupid question time: BSD allows forking of the code base, perhaps to 
>proprietary. If going proprietary, I would imagine you could change the 
>license. So why can't we have a "license fork"?
>

I'll ask, but I think he'll say that the license applies to the source; if
a commercial fork was made, then they are free to hide the source. But if
they ever release the source, then it has to go under the BSD again.


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498)             |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|
                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/

Reply via email to